COUNTER-COINCIDISM 101

THE CONCEPT OF COINCIDISM CLARIFIED

We are at war. Whether we know it or not, war is being waged against every single one of us by a collection of ultra-wealthy globalists who are taking control of the world, a war not with guns and tanks and planes, for most people, at least so far, but rather, a war of words and ideas and information. The only way to win such a war is with words and ideas and information of our own. We need to control the narrative. As brilliant 20th century inventor and visionary R. Buckminster Fuller said, “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” The way to win this war is to build new systems that work so well the old ways just drop away. The way to build that world is with words. It’s the exact opposite of the way George Orwell described elimination of language to control thought. We need to expand language rather than allowing it to contract and we need to be in control of not only which words we’ll be using, but also what they will mean. Sadly, the billionaires conducting a slow steady soft coup are controlling the words, changing their definitions as they see fit and silencing people who dare challenge the one acceptable narrative they allow, the narrative that has been droning at us 24/7/365. We can and must wrest control of our language in order to win this war of the mind.

Coincidism is a brand new word that meets an important need, not just in the English language, but in the realm of human thought processes and ideas. Created in response to the ugly term “conspiracy theories”, which is used primarily to mock and discredit honest people raising awareness of injustices of some sort, this new word defines the opposite end of the spectrum. Coincidists dismiss all “conspiracy theories” as equally unbelievable, for example, by equating the efforts of those claiming they were harmed by pharmaceutical products made by companies with long histories of harming their customers with claims that Hillary Clinton is a lizard. Many times I have seen people state they don’t believe any conspiracy theories because some are so far fetched. When someone makes comparisons like this, you’ll know you’re dealing with a coincidist.

Most folks can differentiate bogus conspiracy theories from credible ones, but there are extremists on either end of the spectrum. Conspiracy theorists believe them all, even if they make no sense and even if they conflict, for example, by believing Geert Vanden Bosch is right that injecting vaccines during a pandemic will cause dangerous mutations and also believing that Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman are correct that viruses have never been properly isolated or proven to cause diseases. Coincidists, on the other hand, are the extremists who deny that any of them are true, even if a mountain of evidence supports the theory, even if HUGE numbers of people say it is so, and even if there’s a financial motive for people to claim it is not. Sane, rational people who are honest with themselves and with each other operate in the middle ground, the grey area, so to speak (green in my diagram below). These people understand that some conspiracies will be proven true at some point in time, others will turn out to be false, and some we’ll never know. The idea that because something is a conspiracy theory means it couldn’t be true is absurd; people are arrested for conspiracies every day all over the globe, and as we see in novels and movies all the time, if it weren’t for conspiracies in police departments and government agencies, even more would be.

This new word and concept flips the conversation around, putting coincidists in a defensive position, having to explain and to justify their belief in absurd degrees of coincidence, where there are so many coincidences it’s a strange coincidence in and of itself. For example, vaccines actually increase the likelihood of coincidism by an order of several magnitudes, more than anything else I am aware of, by a long shot. We win this war when we shift the dialogue so people use words like coincidism and by saying “vaccine-free” as opposed to “unvaccinated” and so on. When these words become part of the public vocabulary we will win the war of ideas, and when we win we will move towards medical freedom, with actual informed consent, something we’ve never been even remotely close to achieving before. The pendulum will swing back from where BIG PHARMA controls us in an insane doctatorship to where we have complete access to all medical research, as it is generated, and to where massive transnational pharmaceutical giants that answer to no one are reduced to subunits that seek actual solutions to our health challenges rather than pursuing new ways to treat symptoms or to addict people. Coincidism is an important new weapon to fight the ongoing program to gaslight and bully and discredit and silence people who have been harmed by pharmaceutical products of one sort or another, especially vaccines, but until now it didn’t really have a name. Now it does. Naming it and shaming it is how we can confront it.

Coincidism is not limited to the medical field by any means, though. For decades the tobacco industry claimed lung cancer in smokers was coincidence and doctors even recommended smoking certain brands. Sugar and other industrial food companies still insist the health issues people who eat their products keep experiencing are also purely coincidental. Politicians will always claim that negative results from their policies are just coincidence while also claiming responsibility for anything that goes well. The mainstream, or legacy media may be the worst, though, with their biased and one-sided reporting and industry generated coincidistic propaganda as if it is factual, or worse, by their omission of anything they deem to be inconsequential because it’s just a coincidence. I can’t think of a better example than how they are ignoring the tens of thousands of people who were recorded as having died from the experimental injections currently being illegally mass marketed globally as vaccines.

Coincidism is a dirty, nasty derogatory term, similar in nature to opportunism, racism, ageism, sexism, ableism, fascism, communism, scientism and so on. The problem is that the vast majority of coincidists have no idea they are coincidists. Coincidists may be our well meaning friends or family members who are oblivious to the hurtful and even hateful demeaning nature of their words, and who actually believe what they are saying or posting, or coincidists can be trolls who know damned well that the things they are saying are either pure falsehoods or, at best, are gross misrepresentations of cherry picked data painting much rosier pictures of the safety and efficacy than an honest and unbiased assessment would yield. Coincidists spread harmful untruths that cause untold amounts of pain and suffering to the people being marginalized as well as to society as a whole, either knowingly or through ignorance.

Counter-coincidism is a new name for the efforts to raise awareness of this situation and to defend the victims of this abuse as well as to help and support our loved ones who have been captured by the cult of coincidism. We need to confront them with logic, with reason, with science, with our personal stories and experiences, with newscasts, with government data, with humor. Whatever it takes. We need to make it look really uncool to post coincidistic hate speech. We need to use their slogans and ideas promoting tolerance against them. I’m sure this thing will take off, because it is so sorely needed. There is a gaping hole where this idea should be, left intentionally blank so we wouldn’t have this tool to fight them with. Think about it. What is the opposite of a conspiracy theorist? Until now, it was nothing, but now, it’s a coincidist.

This is a team effort. We need people to use this word in social media. We need people to share these links. We need people to post comments. We need more people to set up their own Substacks. We need more ideas. We need all hands on deck. We are the people we have been waiting for and this is our time. Either we all stand up together or we will all fall together. We need to use every weapon in our arsenal, and this word is a new one they didn’t see coming. Everyone who is sick and tired of being called a conspiracy theorist is now empowered to turn the conversation around.

So, without further ado, I present the preliminary dictionary entries for my new words.

Coincidism: (noun) co·​in·​sid·​iz·​im

1. a belief that events which appear to be related are unrelated, even when many people involved claim they are related and even when the preponderance of the evidence supports a connection

2. stating or implying that related events are unrelated, whether it’s because they are knowingly lying or whether it is simply due to ignorance

3. hostility toward or discrimination against people who claim a set of incidents are related

4. the art, policy, practice or business of misleading people to believe that events which appear to be related are unrelated

5. belief in, subscribing to, advocating for, promotion about or incitement of coincidism

Coincidist: (noun) co·​in·​si·d​ist

1. a person or institution who believes events which appear to be related are unrelated, even when many people involved claim they are related and even when the preponderance of the evidence supports a connection

2. a person or institution who states or implies that related events are unrelated, whether they are knowingly lying or whether they are simply ignorant

3. a person or institution that shows hostility towards or discrimination against people who believe a set of incidents are related

4. a person or institution who misleads others to believe that events which appear to be related are unrelated

5. a person or institution who believes in, subscribes to, advocates, promotes or incites coincidism

Counter-coincidism: (noun) ​cown·tur·​co·​in·​si·d​iz·​im

1. a belief that events which appear to be related are in fact actually related, even if most people believe they are unrelated (see Occam’s razor)

2. stating or implying that related events are in fact related, even if there are social and financial costs or penalties for doing so

3. politely disproving people who claim related incidents are unrelated with science, reason, personal stories, satire and other means

4. belief in, subscribing to, advocating for or promotion of tolerance and truth

I hope to get this into Webster’s within two years. I’m working on a short version for the urban dictionary. Hopefully I can get it up there real soon. I’m working on a bunch more posts for the counter-coincidism series and am slowly figuring out how to get my other threads lined up. If all goes well I will soon be producing a steady stream of material in one stack or another. I hope that you all enjoy reading it and that it helps break through the cognitive dissonance / mass formation / Stockholm Syndrome thing so many of our loved ones are still stuck in. I look forward to talking to you all about this down below. Let me know what you think. Blessings to all of you, Mark.